[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231215092707.910319166@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 10:12:23 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com,
davem@...emloft.net,
dsahern@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev,
song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
samitolvanen@...gle.com,
keescook@...omium.org,
nathan@...nel.org,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
jpoimboe@...nel.org,
joao@...rdrivepizza.com,
mark.rutland@....com,
peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 7/7] x86/cfi,bpf: Fix bpf_exception_cb() signature
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
As per the earlier patches, BPF sub-programs have bpf_callback_t
signature and CFI expects callers to have matching signature. This is
violated by bpf_prog_aux::bpf_exception_cb().
[peterz: Changelog]
Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAADnVQ+Z7UcXXBBhMubhcMM=R-dExk-uHtfOLtoLxQ1XxEpqEA@mail.gmail.com
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 2 +-
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1484,7 +1484,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
int cgroup_atype; /* enum cgroup_bpf_attach_type */
struct bpf_map *cgroup_storage[MAX_BPF_CGROUP_STORAGE_TYPE];
char name[BPF_OBJ_NAME_LEN];
- unsigned int (*bpf_exception_cb)(u64 cookie, u64 sp, u64 bp);
+ u64 (*bpf_exception_cb)(u64 cookie, u64 sp, u64 bp, u64, u64);
#ifdef CONFIG_SECURITY
void *security;
#endif
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -2537,7 +2537,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc void bpf_throw(u64 cookie)
* which skips compiler generated instrumentation to do the same.
*/
kasan_unpoison_task_stack_below((void *)(long)ctx.sp);
- ctx.aux->bpf_exception_cb(cookie, ctx.sp, ctx.bp);
+ ctx.aux->bpf_exception_cb(cookie, ctx.sp, ctx.bp, 0, 0);
WARN(1, "A call to BPF exception callback should never return\n");
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists