netdev - Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: skip LED triggers on PHYs on SFP modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2023 10:53:17 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
	Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: skip LED triggers on PHYs on SFP modules

On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 06:31:23PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Dec 2023 00:05:35 +0000 Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Calling led_trigger_register() when attaching a PHY located on an SFP
> > module potentially (and practically) leads into a deadlock.
> > Fix this by not calling led_trigger_register() for PHYs localted on SFP
> > modules as such modules actually never got any LEDs.
> 
> Any suggestion of a Fixes tag?
> Looks like the triggers were added a while back, are we only seeing it
> now because we started exercising the code more?

How about:

Fixes: 01e5b728e9e4 ("net: phy: Add a binding for PHY LEDs")

       Andrew