[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZX3LqN8DSdKXqsYc@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 16:09:12 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Jie Luo <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
hkallweit1@...il.com, corbet@....net, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
f.fainelli@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 14/14] dt-bindings: net: ar803x: add qca8084 PHY
properties
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 10:41:28PM +0800, Jie Luo wrote:
>
>
> On 12/16/2023 9:51 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 11:21:53AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > The following is the chip package, the chip can work on the switch mode
> > > > like the existed upstream code qca8k, where PHY1-PHY4 is connected with
> > > > MAC1-MAC4 directly;
> > >
> > > Ah, that is new information, and has a big effect on the design.
> >
> > This QCA8084 that's being proposed in these patches is not a PHY in
> > itself, but is a SoC. I came across this:
> >
> > https://www.rt-rk.com/android-tv-solution-tv-in-smartphone-pantsstb-based-on-qualcomm-soc-design/
>
> The chip mentioned in the link you mentioned is SoC, which is not the
> chip that the qca8084 driver work for.
So there's two chips called QCA8084 both produced by Qualcomm? I find
that hard to believe.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists