[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2cb29821-7135-4369-ebc7-c742226e6230@omp.ru>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 22:43:47 +0300
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
<edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<richardcochran@...il.com>, <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
<yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>, <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
<geert+renesas@...der.be>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Claudiu Beznea
<claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 17/21] net: ravb: Keep clock request
operations grouped together
On 12/14/23 2:45 PM, Claudiu wrote:
> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
>
> Keep clock request operations grouped togeter to have all clock-related
> code in a single place. This makes the code simpler to follow.
>
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2:
> - none; this patch is new
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 28 ++++++++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> index 38999ef1ea85..a2a64c22ec41 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> @@ -2768,6 +2768,20 @@ static int ravb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (error)
> goto out_reset_assert;
>
> + priv->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
> + error = PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
> + goto out_reset_assert;
> + }
> +
> + if (info->gptp_ref_clk) {
> + priv->gptp_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "gptp");
> + if (IS_ERR(priv->gptp_clk)) {
> + error = PTR_ERR(priv->gptp_clk);
> + goto out_reset_assert;
> + }
> + }
> +
> priv->refclk = devm_clk_get_optional(&pdev->dev, "refclk");
> if (IS_ERR(priv->refclk)) {
> error = PTR_ERR(priv->refclk);
Hmm... I think we currently have all these calls in one place.
Perhaps you just shouldn't have moved this code around?
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists