[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231216100337.GL6288@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 10:03:37 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Lukasz Plachno <lukasz.plachno@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jakub Buchocki <jakubx.buchocki@...el.com>,
Mateusz Pacuszka <mateuszx.pacuszka@...el.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v3 2/2] ice: Implement 'flow-type ether' rules
On Thu, Dec 14, 2023 at 05:34:49AM +0100, Lukasz Plachno wrote:
...
> @@ -1199,6 +1212,99 @@ ice_set_fdir_ip6_usr_seg(struct ice_flow_seg_info *seg,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * ice_fdir_vlan_valid - validate VLAN data for Flow Director rule
> + * @fsp: pointer to ethtool Rx flow specification
> + *
> + * Return: true if vlan data is valid, false otherwise
> + */
> +static bool ice_fdir_vlan_valid(struct ethtool_rx_flow_spec *fsp)
> +{
> + if (fsp->m_ext.vlan_etype &&
> + ntohs(fsp->h_ext.vlan_etype) & ~(ETH_P_8021Q | ETH_P_8021AD))
> + return false;
Hi Jakub and Lukasz,
It is not obvious to me that a bitwise comparison of the vlan_ethtype is
correct. Possibly naively I expected something more like
(completely untested!):
if (!eth_type_vlan(sp->m_ext.vlan_etype))
return false:
> +
> + if (fsp->m_ext.vlan_tci &&
> + ntohs(fsp->h_ext.vlan_tci) >= VLAN_N_VID)
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists