[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKXUXMxh3rM8da9kJG_=Sy8fQqqf7f8xXaHDHPLvpvRiYg1e5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:03:54 +0100
From: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>, Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>,
Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>, Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
Michael Buesch <m@...s.ch>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
b43-dev@...ts.infradead.org, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcma,ssb: simplify dependency handling for bcma and ssb drivers
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 3:59 PM Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes:
>
> > On Mon, 2023-12-18 at 12:58 +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> >
> > Dunno, I'm not super involved with this but ...
> >
> >> +++ b/drivers/bcma/Kconfig
> >> @@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
> >> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >> -config BCMA_POSSIBLE
> >> - bool
> >> - depends on HAS_IOMEM && HAS_DMA
> >> - default y
> >> -
> >> menuconfig BCMA
> >> tristate "Broadcom specific AMBA"
> >> - depends on BCMA_POSSIBLE
> >> + depends on HAS_IOMEM && HAS_DMA
> >
> > [...]
> >> config BRCMSMAC
> >> tristate "Broadcom IEEE802.11n PCIe SoftMAC WLAN driver"
> >> - depends on MAC80211
> >> - depends on BCMA_POSSIBLE
> >> + depends on HAS_IOMEM && HAS_DMA && MAC80211
> >> select BCMA
> >
> > to me it kind of seems more obvious for example in this case to say
> > "depend on BCMA_POSSIBLE and select BCMA" rather than open-coding the
> > BCMA dependencies both here and in BCMA? Now granted, they're rather
> > unlikely to _change_, but it still seems more obvious?
>
> I was thinking the same. Lukas, is there a specific reason why you want
> to change this or this just something you noticed by chance?
>
I just noticed this by chance---well, I was wondering what these
config symbols were doing in my kernel build configuration (they are
actually in every config). While reading through the code, I was
confused on what the dependencies were trying to tell me, as the
config symbols and conditions seemed to repeat over and over in
different places.
I thought it was worth a clean up and this was the patch I came up
with in the end.
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists