[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231218161704.05c25766@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:17:04 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Alexey Dobriyan
<adobriyan@...il.com>, FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>, Linux
Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the execve tree with the net-next tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the execve tree got a conflict in:
MAINTAINERS
between commit:
cbaa28f970a1 ("MAINTAINERS: add Rust PHY abstractions for ETHERNET PHY LIBRARY")
from the net-next tree and commit:
0a8a952a75f2 ("ELF, MAINTAINERS: specifically mention ELF")
from the execve tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc MAINTAINERS
index 1f53b4c593dd,08278b9ede48..000000000000
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@@ -7919,15 -7797,7 +7919,15 @@@ F: include/uapi/linux/mdio.
F: include/uapi/linux/mii.h
F: net/core/of_net.c
+ETHERNET PHY LIBRARY [RUST]
+M: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
+R: Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>
+L: netdev@...r.kernel.org
+L: rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org
+S: Maintained
+F: rust/kernel/net/phy.rs
+
- EXEC & BINFMT API
+ EXEC & BINFMT API, ELF
R: Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
R: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
L: linux-mm@...ck.org
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists