[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<170299622376.11598.17473952266274189003.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 14:30:23 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: ast@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+f43a23b6e622797c7a28@...kaller.appspotmail.com, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
daniel@...earbox.net, john.fastabend@...il.com, andrii@...nel.org,
song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, keescook@...omium.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: use nla_ok() instead of checking nla_len
directly
Hello:
This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>:
On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 15:19:04 -0800 you wrote:
> nla_len may also be too short to be sane, in which case after
> recent changes nla_len() will return a wrapped value.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+f43a23b6e622797c7a28@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 172db56d90d2 ("netlink: Return unsigned value for nla_len()")
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next] bpf: use nla_ok() instead of checking nla_len directly
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2130c519a401
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists