netdev - [PATCH v3 net-next 0/4] af_unix: Random improvements for GC.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231219004609.12656-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 09:46:09 +0900
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <kuniyu@...zon.com>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <ivan@...udflare.com>,
	<kuba@...nel.org>, <kuni1840@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/4] af_unix: Random improvements for GC.

From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2023 16:50:16 +0900
> If more than 16000 inflight AF_UNIX sockets exist on a host, each
> sendmsg() will be forced to wait for unix_gc() even if a process
> is not sending any FD.
> 
> This series tries not to impose such a penalty on sane users who
> do not send AF_UNIX FDs or do not have inflight sockets more than
> SCM_MAX_FD * 8.
> 
> 
> Changes:
>   v3:

Just noticed the patch 4 needs --3way to apply, probably due to
the recent io_uring commit.

I'll rebase on the latest and repost v4 to make patchwork happy.
Sorry for the noise.

---
pw-bot: cr