netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 01/15] e1000e: make lost bits explicit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ee1112af-cb13-483b-b6b5-4489a39c57cc@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2023 09:57:46 +0200
From: "naamax.meir" <naamax.meir@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
 intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org
Cc: przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, aleksander.lobakin@...el.com,
 marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com, horms@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v2 01/15] e1000e: make lost
 bits explicit

On 12/6/2023 03:01, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> For more than 15 years this code has passed in a request for a page and
> masked off that page when read/writing. This code has been here forever,
> but FIELD_PREP finds the bug when converted to use it. Change the code
> to do exactly the same thing but allow the conversion to FIELD_PREP in a
> later patch. To make it clear what we lost when making this change I
> left a comment, but there is no point to change the code to generate a
> correct sequence at this point.
> 
> This is not a Fixes tagged patch on purpose because it doesn't change
> the binary output.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Marcin Szycik <marcin.szycik@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
> ---
>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/80003es2lan.c | 13 +++++++------
>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

Tested-by: Naama Meir <naamax.meir@...ux.intel.com>