netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] net: dsa: realtek: drop cleanup from realtek

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ll6hlbujrzq6djjzfcoxp3powgrwxa6moplhrzpdy5fo5qwlxt@civqgrrqu727>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 20:05:45 +0000
From: Alvin Šipraga <ALSI@...g-olufsen.dk>
To: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
CC: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linus.walleij@...aro.org"
	<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
	"f.fainelli@...il.com" <f.fainelli@...il.com>, "davem@...emloft.net"
	<davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"arinc.unal@...nc9.com" <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] net: dsa: realtek: drop cleanup from
 realtek_ops

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 07:04:18PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 01:57:41PM +0000, Alvin Šipraga wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 01:24:24AM -0300, Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca wrote:
> > > It was never used and never referenced.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Alvin Šipraga <alsi@...g-olufsen.dk>
> > 
> > You should always put your Signed-off-by last when sending patches.
> 
> I'm not so sure about that.
> 
> When you send a patch, it gets reviewed and then accepted all in the
> same version, the Reviewed-by tag will be after your sign off. It makes
> more sense to me that if you send a patch with a review tag carried
> over, you put it in the same place where it would sit if it was received
> on the final patch version. Idk, not too big of a deal.

It's what I see most of the time, and Andrew recently pointed out the
same [1]. Still there does not seem to be a consensus... [2] [3] [4]

But yea, not a big deal!

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/8d2dd95b-13f7-41d8-997f-d5c2953dcb06@lunn.ch/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200408073603.GA948@gerhold.net/
[3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20190627083443.4f4918a7@lwn.net/
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/all/87a7zzd47q.fsf@intel.com/