[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231221204616.04CZKAKf@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 21:46:16 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/24] locking: Introduce nested-BH locking.
On 2023-12-18 16:41:42 [-0800], Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> To make progress on other parts of the stack we could also take
> the local lock around all of napi->poll() for now..
Okay. Thank you. I will look into this next year again.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists