[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <prjrrsznvpnbanseqttqgtu3s6kgillyyhs5hozwxwh4kt7eiv@zmups3rcbvby>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 00:56:46 +0300
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To: Leong Ching Swee <leong.ching.swee@...el.com>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Teoh Ji Sheng <ji.sheng.teoh@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 4/4] net: stmmac: Use interrupt mode INTM=1
for per channel irq
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 01:44:51PM +0800, Leong Ching Swee wrote:
> From: Swee Leong Ching <leong.ching.swee@...el.com>
>
> Enable per DMA channel interrupt that uses shared peripheral
> interrupt (SPI), so only per channel TX and RX intr (TI/RI)
> are handled by TX/RX ISR without calling common interrupt ISR.
>
> Signed-off-by: Teoh Ji Sheng <ji.sheng.teoh@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Swee Leong Ching <leong.ching.swee@...el.com>
> ---
> .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2.h | 3 ++
> .../ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_dma.c | 32 +++++++++++--------
> 2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2.h
> index 207ff1799f2c..04bf731cb7ea 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2.h
> @@ -346,6 +346,9 @@
> /* DMA Registers */
> #define XGMAC_DMA_MODE 0x00003000
> #define XGMAC_SWR BIT(0)
> +#define XGMAC_DMA_MODE_INTM_MASK GENMASK(13, 12)
> +#define XGMAC_DMA_MODE_INTM_SHIFT 12
> +#define XGMAC_DMA_MODE_INTM_MODE1 0x1
> #define XGMAC_DMA_SYSBUS_MODE 0x00003004
> #define XGMAC_WR_OSR_LMT GENMASK(29, 24)
> #define XGMAC_WR_OSR_LMT_SHIFT 24
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_dma.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_dma.c
> index 3cde695fec91..dcb9f094415d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_dma.c
> @@ -31,6 +31,13 @@ static void dwxgmac2_dma_init(void __iomem *ioaddr,
> value |= XGMAC_EAME;
>
> writel(value, ioaddr + XGMAC_DMA_SYSBUS_MODE);
> +
> + if (dma_cfg->multi_irq_en) {
> + value = readl(ioaddr + XGMAC_DMA_MODE);
> + value &= ~XGMAC_DMA_MODE_INTM_MASK;
> + value |= (XGMAC_DMA_MODE_INTM_MODE1 << XGMAC_DMA_MODE_INTM_SHIFT);
> + writel(value, ioaddr + XGMAC_DMA_MODE);
> + }
> }
>
> static void dwxgmac2_dma_init_chan(struct stmmac_priv *priv,
> @@ -365,19 +372,18 @@ static int dwxgmac2_dma_interrupt(struct stmmac_priv *priv,
> }
>
> /* TX/RX NORMAL interrupts */
> - if (likely(intr_status & XGMAC_NIS)) {
> - if (likely(intr_status & XGMAC_RI)) {
> - u64_stats_update_begin(&rxq_stats->syncp);
> - rxq_stats->rx_normal_irq_n++;
> - u64_stats_update_end(&rxq_stats->syncp);
> - ret |= handle_rx;
> - }
> - if (likely(intr_status & (XGMAC_TI | XGMAC_TBU))) {
> - u64_stats_update_begin(&txq_stats->syncp);
> - txq_stats->tx_normal_irq_n++;
> - u64_stats_update_end(&txq_stats->syncp);
> - ret |= handle_tx;
> - }
> + if (likely(intr_status & XGMAC_RI)) {
> + u64_stats_update_begin(&rxq_stats->syncp);
> + rxq_stats->rx_normal_irq_n++;
> + u64_stats_update_end(&rxq_stats->syncp);
> + ret |= handle_rx;
> + }
> +
> + if (likely(intr_status & (XGMAC_TI | XGMAC_TBU))) {
> + u64_stats_update_begin(&txq_stats->syncp);
> + txq_stats->tx_normal_irq_n++;
> + u64_stats_update_end(&txq_stats->syncp);
> + ret |= handle_tx;
Could you please clarify my comment to the original patch:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 20:10:21PM +0300, Serge Semin wrote:
> Just curious. Is this change really necessary seeing NIS IRQ is
> unmasked and it is unmasked-OR of the RI/TI/TBU flags in the
> DMA_CHx_Status register? Moreover based on the HW manual,
> DMA_CHx_Status reflects raw IRQ flags status except NIS and AIS which
> are the masked OR of the respective flags. So AFAIU NIS will be set in
> anyway if you have RI/TI/TBU IRQs enabled.
-Serge(y)
> }
>
> /* Clear interrupts */
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists