lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 23:09:21 +0100
From: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: net: phy: Document new LEDs
 polarity property

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:34:41AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > I do worry this continues to evolve until we've re-created the pinctrl 
> > binding...
> 
> Hi Rob
> 
> What is you opinion of the pinctrl binding? Should we just copy parts
> of it?
>

Hi,

I have the new series ready but I'm not sure pincfg-node have useful
property.

What we should use from there? From what I can see only output-low would
be useful to us. I didn't find a way to handle the inactive mode.

Should I send the new series so we can continue the discussion there or
better to wait for Rob feedback?

-- 
	Ansuel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ