netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH for-faizal 0/4] tc-taprio selftests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2023 14:28:45 +0800
From: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"Abdul Rahim, Faizal" <faizal.abdul.rahim@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH for-faizal 0/4] tc-taprio selftests

On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 03:25:17PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Unfortunately the isochron version from debian will not work on veth
> pairs, I had to make some changes and add the --omit-hwts option to
> the sender and receiver programs. The modified version is on this branch
> here, I will merge the changes to 'master' once I have enough confidence
> in them.
> https://github.com/vladimiroltean/isochron/tree/omit-hwts
> 
> For testing the tc-taprio software scheduling path, we don't need PTP
> synchronization or hardware timestamps anyway.
> 
> This is just a skeleton that I'm hoping Faizal can pick up and extend
> with more test cases for dynamic schedule changes. It should run
> primarily on the veth driver, but should behave the same on any network
> driver as well, including those who also have tc-taprio offload.

Tested-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>