lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231223145736.GD201037@kernel.org> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2023 14:57:36 +0000 From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org> To: deepakx.nagaraju@...el.com Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jdavem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, mun.yew.tham@...el.com, Andy Schevchenko <andriy.schevchenko@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] net: ethernet: altera: fix indentation warnings On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 09:40:39PM +0800, deepakx.nagaraju@...el.com wrote: > From: Nagaraju DeepakX <deepakx.nagaraju@...el.com> > > Fix indentation issues such as missing a blank line after declarations > and alignment issues. > > Signed-off-by: Nagaraju DeepakX <deepakx.nagaraju@...el.com> > Reviewed-by: Andy Schevchenko <andriy.schevchenko@...ux.intel.com> ... > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/altera/altera_tse_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/altera/altera_tse_main.c > index 1c8763be0e4b..6a1a004ea693 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/altera/altera_tse_main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/altera/altera_tse_main.c > @@ -258,14 +258,12 @@ static int alloc_init_skbufs(struct altera_tse_private *priv) > int i; > > /* Create Rx ring buffer */ > - priv->rx_ring = kcalloc(rx_descs, sizeof(struct tse_buffer), > - GFP_KERNEL); > + priv->rx_ring = kcalloc(rx_descs, sizeof(struct tse_buffer), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!priv->rx_ring) > goto err_rx_ring; > > /* Create Tx ring buffer */ > - priv->tx_ring = kcalloc(tx_descs, sizeof(struct tse_buffer), > - GFP_KERNEL); > + priv->tx_ring = kcalloc(tx_descs, sizeof(struct tse_buffer), GFP_KERNEL); Hi, Networking still prefers code that is less than 80 columns wide. So I think the above changes are not desirable. The rest of the patch looks find to me, assuming the maintainers want to take cosmetic changes of this nature. Which, personally, I lean to thinking is ok in the context of the rest of this patch-set. > if (!priv->tx_ring) > goto err_tx_ring; > ...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists