netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] dt-bindings: net: ipq4019-mdio: Document ipq5332 platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <28c8b31c-8dcb-4a19-9084-22c77a74b9a1@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2023 14:18:19 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Jie Luo <quic_luoj@...cinc.com>, agross@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org,
 konrad.dybcio@...aro.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
 kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
 krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, andrew@...n.ch,
 hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, robert.marko@...tura.hr
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 quic_srichara@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] dt-bindings: net: ipq4019-mdio: Document ipq5332
 platform

On 26/12/2023 14:06, Jie Luo wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> +      the platform IPQ50xx/IPQ5332.
>>>>
>>>> So these are valid for all platforms or not? Looks not, but nothing
>>>> narrows the list for other boards.
>>>
>>> i add the limitation on the reg usage for the ipq5332 platform on the
>>> following part "if condition" of this patch, i will update the patch
>>> to narrow down for the other compatibles.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Anyway, why do you add entries in the middle? LDO was the second, so it
>>>> cannot be now fifth.
>>>
>>> As Rob's suggestion, i move the cmn_blk to second location for
>>> simplifying the limitation description, i checked the upstream dts code,
>>> the LDO is not used currently, so we can move cmn_blk to the second
>>> location here.
>>
>> I cannot find his suggestion in the previous thread. Where did he
>> propose it?
> 
> Rob suggested this on the V2 as below.
> "
> Perhaps cmn_blk should come 2nd, so all the variants have the same entry
> indices. Then you can move this to the top level and just say 'minItems:
> 4' here.

Wasn't this for new devices? What about all existing which have LDO as
the second entry?

>>>>> +  qcom,cmn-ref-clock-frequency:
>>>>> +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>>>> +    enum:
>>>>> +      - 25000000
>>>>> +      - 31250000
>>>>> +      - 40000000
>>>>> +      - 48000000
>>>>> +      - 50000000
>>>>> +      - 96000000
>>>>> +    default: 48000000
>>>>> +    description: |
>>>>> +      The reference clock source of CMN PLL block is selectable, the
>>>>> +      reference clock source can be from wifi module or the external
>>>>> +      xtal, the reference clock frequency 48MHZ can be from internal
>>>>> +      wifi or the external xtal, if absent, the internal 48MHZ is used,
>>>>> +      if the 48MHZ is specified, which means the external 48Mhz is used.
>>>>
>>>> This does not resolve mine and Conor's concerns from previous version.
>>>> External clocks are defined as clock inputs.
>>>
>>> No matter the external or internal reference clock, they are the clock
>>> source selection for CMN, there are only 48MHZ can be external or
>>> internal, other clocks have the different clock rate, so the internal
>>> 48MHZ reference clock can be implied when the
>>> "qcom,cmn-ref-clock-frequency" is not defined, which is suggested by
>>> Conor in the previous
>>> comments.
>>
>> I don't think he proposed it, but maybe I missed some message (care to
>> point me to his message where he agreed on usage of
>> qcom,cmn-ref-clock-frequency?). I am pretty sure we both stayed on the
>> same page, that the presence of clocks defines choice of internal clock.
>> This property should go away.
> 
> Sorry for this confusion.
> Rob said the internal reference source can be decided by the absence of
> the property combined with compatible string, because i said the

So all your three DT maintainers agree that lack of property for
choosing clock, defines the usage of interrupt source.

Now we had huge amount of arguments that you do not represent properly
the clock relationships. Still.

> internal 96MHZ is used on ipq5018 currently in the previous message.
> 
> per double checked the current IPQ platforms, the internal 96MHZ is also
> possible on ipq9574, and the reference clock source should be kept as
> configurable instead of limited by the compatible string, maybe the
> different reference clock source is acquired in the future, even
> currently it is not used on the special platform for now.
> 
> so i update the solution with a little bit of changes.

You still do not want to implement our suggestions and I don't
understand your arguments. Nothing in above paragraph explains me why
you cannot use clock provider/consumer relationships.


Best regards,
Krzysztof