lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20231231144421.13ba1d04@hermes.local> Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 14:44:21 -0800 From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] packet: Improve exception handling in fanout_add() On Sun, 31 Dec 2023 16:39:02 +0100 Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de> wrote: > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> > Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 16:30:51 +0100 > > The kfree() function was called in some cases by the fanout_add() function > even if the passed variable contained a null pointer. > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > Thus use another label. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net> NAK kfree of null is perfectly fine. There is no need for this patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists