netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 33/40] netfs, cachefiles: Pass upper bound length to allow expansion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <198744.1704215477@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2024 17:11:17 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
    Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
    Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>,
    Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@...rosoft.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>,
    Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
    Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>,
    Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
    Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>, linux-cachefs@...hat.com,
    linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
    linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
    v9fs@...ts.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
    linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
    Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 33/40] netfs, cachefiles: Pass upper bound length to allow expansion

Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:

> >   	down = start - round_down(start, PAGE_SIZE);
> >   	*_start = start - down;
> >   	*_len = round_up(down + len, PAGE_SIZE);
> > +	if (down < start || *_len > upper_len)
> > +		return -ENOBUFS;
> 
> Sorry for bothering. We just found some strange when testing
> today-next EROFS over fscache.
> 
> I'm not sure the meaning of
>     if (down < start
> 
> For example, if start is page-aligned, down == 0.
> 
> so as long as start > 0 and page-aligned, it will return
> -ENOBUFS.  Does it an intended behavior?

Yeah, I think that's wrong.

Does the attached help?

David
---

diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/io.c b/fs/cachefiles/io.c
index bffffedce4a9..7529b40bc95a 100644
--- a/fs/cachefiles/io.c
+++ b/fs/cachefiles/io.c
@@ -522,16 +522,22 @@ int __cachefiles_prepare_write(struct cachefiles_object *object,
 			       bool no_space_allocated_yet)
 {
 	struct cachefiles_cache *cache = object->volume->cache;
-	loff_t start = *_start, pos;
-	size_t len = *_len, down;
+	unsigned long long start = *_start, pos;
+	size_t len = *_len;
 	int ret;
 
 	/* Round to DIO size */
-	down = start - round_down(start, PAGE_SIZE);
-	*_start = start - down;
-	*_len = round_up(down + len, PAGE_SIZE);
-	if (down < start || *_len > upper_len)
+	start = round_down(*_start, PAGE_SIZE);
+	if (start != *_start) {
+		kleave(" = -ENOBUFS [down]");
+		return -ENOBUFS;
+	}
+	if (*_len > upper_len) {
+		kleave(" = -ENOBUFS [up]");
 		return -ENOBUFS;
+	}
+
+	*_len = round_up(len, PAGE_SIZE);
 
 	/* We need to work out whether there's sufficient disk space to perform
 	 * the write - but we can skip that check if we have space already
@@ -542,7 +548,7 @@ int __cachefiles_prepare_write(struct cachefiles_object *object,
 
 	pos = cachefiles_inject_read_error();
 	if (pos == 0)
-		pos = vfs_llseek(file, *_start, SEEK_DATA);
+		pos = vfs_llseek(file, start, SEEK_DATA);
 	if (pos < 0 && pos >= (loff_t)-MAX_ERRNO) {
 		if (pos == -ENXIO)
 			goto check_space; /* Unallocated tail */
@@ -550,7 +556,7 @@ int __cachefiles_prepare_write(struct cachefiles_object *object,
 					  cachefiles_trace_seek_error);
 		return pos;
 	}
-	if ((u64)pos >= (u64)*_start + *_len)
+	if (pos >= start + *_len)
 		goto check_space; /* Unallocated region */
 
 	/* We have a block that's at least partially filled - if we're low on
@@ -563,13 +569,13 @@ int __cachefiles_prepare_write(struct cachefiles_object *object,
 
 	pos = cachefiles_inject_read_error();
 	if (pos == 0)
-		pos = vfs_llseek(file, *_start, SEEK_HOLE);
+		pos = vfs_llseek(file, start, SEEK_HOLE);
 	if (pos < 0 && pos >= (loff_t)-MAX_ERRNO) {
 		trace_cachefiles_io_error(object, file_inode(file), pos,
 					  cachefiles_trace_seek_error);
 		return pos;
 	}
-	if ((u64)pos >= (u64)*_start + *_len)
+	if (pos >= start + *_len)
 		return 0; /* Fully allocated */
 
 	/* Partially allocated, but insufficient space: cull. */
@@ -577,7 +583,7 @@ int __cachefiles_prepare_write(struct cachefiles_object *object,
 	ret = cachefiles_inject_remove_error();
 	if (ret == 0)
 		ret = vfs_fallocate(file, FALLOC_FL_PUNCH_HOLE | FALLOC_FL_KEEP_SIZE,
-				    *_start, *_len);
+				    start, *_len);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		trace_cachefiles_io_error(object, file_inode(file), ret,
 					  cachefiles_trace_fallocate_error);