netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: Revert no longer abort SYN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240102140232.77915fc3@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 14:02:32 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Shachar Kagan <skagan@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Bagas Sanjaya
 <bagasdotme@...il.com>, "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)"
 <regressions@...mhuis.info>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: Revert no longer abort SYN_SENT when
 receiving some ICMP

On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 10:46:13 +0100 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > The issue appears while using Vagrant to manage nested VMs.
> > The steps are:
> > * create vagrant file
> > * vagrant up
> > * vagrant halt (VM is created but shut down)
> > * vagrant up - fail
> 
> I would rather have an explanation, instead of reverting a valid patch.

+1 obviously. Your refusal to debug this any further does not put 
nVidia's TCP / NVMe offload in a good light. On one hand you
claim to have TCP experts in house and are pushing TCP offloads and
on the other you can't debug a TCP issue for which you reportedly 
have an easy repro? Does not add up.