netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 0/4] af_unix: Random improvements for GC.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 15:29:11 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Ivan Babrou
 <ivan@...udflare.com>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>,
 <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 0/4] af_unix: Random improvements for GC.

On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 12:00:58 +0900 Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> If more than 16000 inflight AF_UNIX sockets exist on a host, each
> sendmsg() will be forced to wait for unix_gc() even if a process
> is not sending any FD.
> 
> This series tries not to impose such a penalty on sane users who
> do not send AF_UNIX FDs or do not have inflight sockets more than
> SCM_MAX_FD * 8.
> 
> Cleanup patches for commit 69db702c8387 ("io_uring/af_unix: disable
> sending io_uring over sockets") will be posted later as noted in [0].

Could you repost? I tried to revive it in patchwork but I think 
it keeps getting Archived because it's more than 2 weeks old :(