netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 00/20] bridge: vni: UI fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87wmss9j59.fsf@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 10:19:27 +0100
From: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
CC: Benjamin Poirier <bpoirier@...dia.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Petr
 Machata" <petrm@...dia.com>, Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next 00/20] bridge: vni: UI fixes

Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org> writes:

> consider consolidating some of the patches.
> Better to have 10 patches than 20.

The original that I reviewed internally was 7 patches. I asked Benjamin
to split some of it more, because it was tricky to figure out that all
the changes in an individual patch cancel out exactly right to deliver
what the commit message promised. But yeah, I bet there's a middle
ground.