netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: Revert no longer abort SYN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240102114147.GG6361@unreal>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2024 13:41:47 +0200
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Shachar Kagan <skagan@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>,
	"Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@...mhuis.info>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: Revert no longer abort SYN_SENT when
 receiving some ICMP

On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 11:03:55AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 10:58 AM Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 02, 2024 at 10:46:13AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 10:01 AM Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > From: Shachar Kagan <skagan@...dia.com>
> > > >
> > > > This reverts commit 0a8de364ff7a14558e9676f424283148110384d6.
> > > >
> > > > Shachar reported that Vagrant (https://www.vagrantup.com/), which is
> > > > very popular tool to manage fleet of VMs stopped to work after commit
> > > > citied in Fixes line.
> > > >
> > > > The issue appears while using Vagrant to manage nested VMs.
> > > > The steps are:
> > > > * create vagrant file
> > > > * vagrant up
> > > > * vagrant halt (VM is created but shut down)
> > > > * vagrant up - fail
> > > >
> > >
> > > I would rather have an explanation, instead of reverting a valid patch.
> > >
> > > I have been on vacation for some time. I may have missed a detailed
> > > explanation, please repost if needed.
> >
> > Our detailed explanation that revert worked. You provided the patch that
> > broke, so please let's not require from users to debug it.
> >
> > If you need a help to reproduce and/or test some hypothesis, Shachar
> > will be happy to help you, just ask.
> 
> I have asked already, and received files that showed no ICMP relevant
> interactions.
> 
> Can someone from your team help Shachar to get  a packet capture of
> both TCP _and_ ICMP packets ?

I or Gal will help her, but for now let's revert it, before we will see
this breakage in merge window and later in all other branches which will
be based on -rc1.

> 
> Otherwise there is little I can do. I can not blindly trust someone
> that a valid patch broke something, just because 'something broke'

We use standard Vagrant, you can try to reproduce the issue locally.

Thanks