[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240103153336.424dcfe3@device-28.home>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 15:33:36 +0100
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, andrew@...n.ch, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, herve.codina@...tlin.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, vladimir.oltean@....com,
kory.maincent@...tlin.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, corbet@....net,
kabel@...nel.org, piergiorgio.beruto@...il.com, o.rempel@...gutronix.de,
nicveronese@...il.com, horms@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 00/13] Introduce PHY listing and
link_topology tracking
Hi Russell, Jakub,
On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 10:51:25 -0800
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2024 11:57:09 +0000 Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> > ... and I haven't reviewed this yet. I guess it's now pointless to
> > review.
>
> I guess the shutdown was only a partial success. Nobody cleaned out
> pending stuff on the 23rd, and old things got applied now before we
> even officially reopened :( It is what it is, please review anyway,
> we'll be reverting things which shouldn't have been applied..
I've submitted the ethtool counterpart of that work a few seconds ago :
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240103142950.235888-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com/T/#m334b7cec4be1c78d399d0899a30d522ab57b4622
I think this could help in reviewing the overall design and identifying
any glaring issue with this.
Thanks,
Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists