netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] selftests: rtnetlink: check enslaving iface in a bond

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 13:21:20 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
Cc: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, "David S . Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Dumazet
 <edumazet@...gle.com>, Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>, David Ahern
 <dsahern@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] selftests: rtnetlink: check enslaving iface
 in a bond

On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 15:15:33 +0100 Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
> > The net-next added new function setup_ns in lib.sh and converted all hard code
> > netns setup. I think It may be good to post this patch set to net-next
> > to reduce future merge conflicts.  
> 
> The first patch is for net. I can post the second one to net-next if it eases
> the merge.
> 
> > Jakub, Paolo, please correct me if we can't post fixes to net-next.  
>
> Please, let me know if I should target net-next for the second patch.

Looks like the patch applies to net-next, so hopefully there won't 
be any actual conflicts. But it'd be good to follow up and refactor
it in net-next once net gets merged in. As long as I'm not missing
anything - up to you - I'm fine with either sending the test to
net-next like Hangbin suggests, or following up in net-next to use
setup_ns.