[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM0EoMkP18tbOuFyWgr=BaCODcRTJR=rU6hitcQSY_HD9gD87g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 11:15:42 -0500
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v2] remove support for iptables action
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 10:25 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2023 12:25:24 -0500 Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 1:25 PM Stephen Hemminger
> > <stephen@...workplumber.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > There is an open upstream kernel patch to remove ipt action from
> > > kernel. This is corresponding iproute2 change.
> > >
> > > - Remove support fot ipt and xt in tc.
> > > - Remove no longer used header files.
> > > - Update man pages.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
> >
> > Does em_ipt need the m_xt*.c? Florian/Eyal can comment. Otherwise,
> > Reviewed-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>
>
> Damn, I was waiting for Eyal to comment but you didn't CC
> either him or Florian 😆️
>
> Eyal, would it be possible for you to test if the latest
> net-next and iproute2 with this patch works for you?
Sorry bout that. Also Florian (who wrote the code).
cheers,
jamal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists