netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] selftests: rtnetlink: check enslaving iface in a bond

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <dccea5b2-ceb9-483c-9274-b3e33f92c949@6wind.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 17:39:28 +0100
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, "David S . Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Phil Sutter <phil@....cc>,
 David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 2/2] selftests: rtnetlink: check enslaving iface in
 a bond

Le 04/01/2024 à 16:17, Jakub Kicinski a écrit :
> On Thu, 4 Jan 2024 14:51:08 +0100 Nicolas Dichtel wrote:
>>> Looks like the patch applies to net-next, so hopefully there won't 
>>> be any actual conflicts. But it'd be good to follow up and refactor
>>> it in net-next once net gets merged in. As long as I'm not missing
>>> anything - up to you - I'm fine with either sending the test to
>>> net-next like Hangbin suggests, or following up in net-next to use
>>> setup_ns.  
>> I will send a follow-up once net gets merged in net-next.
> 
> Ack, there's still going to be a v3 to update the error message, 
> tho, right?
Right, I was waiting for the conclusion about this patch ;-)