netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net/sched: We should only add appropriate qdiscs blocks to ports' xarray

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:40:04 -0300
From: Victor Nogueira <victor@...atatu.com>
To: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@...il.com>, jhs@...atatu.com,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us
Cc: idosch@...sch.org, mleitner@...hat.com, vladbu@...dia.com,
 paulb@...dia.com, pctammela@...atatu.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel@...atatu.com, syzbot+84339b9e7330daae4d66@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
 syzbot+806b0572c8d06b66b234@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
 syzbot+0039110f932d438130f9@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net/sched: We should only add appropriate
 qdiscs blocks to ports' xarray

On 04/01/2024 15:49, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
>>> [...]
>> Hi Vector,
>>
>> Thank you for fixing this issue!
>> Could you also add a test case to avoid regression in future?
>> We have BPF test cases that fails for this issue. However,
>> not everyone run BPF selftest for netdev changes.
>> It would be better to have a test case for net as well.
>>
> 
> The following links are about the errors of bpf selftest. FYI!
> 
>   - 
> https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/7401181881/job/20136944224
>   - 
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ce8d3e55-b8bc-409c-ace9-5cf1c4f7c88e@gmail.com/

Thank you for the suggestion and pointers, will do.

cheers,
Victor