[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1fd82f42-9f9c-4e4a-9031-2ab51898c899@mojatatu.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 16:40:04 -0300
From: Victor Nogueira <victor@...atatu.com>
To: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@...il.com>, jhs@...atatu.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us
Cc: idosch@...sch.org, mleitner@...hat.com, vladbu@...dia.com,
paulb@...dia.com, pctammela@...atatu.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...atatu.com, syzbot+84339b9e7330daae4d66@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+806b0572c8d06b66b234@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
syzbot+0039110f932d438130f9@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/1] net/sched: We should only add appropriate
qdiscs blocks to ports' xarray
On 04/01/2024 15:49, Kui-Feng Lee wrote:
>>> [...]
>> Hi Vector,
>>
>> Thank you for fixing this issue!
>> Could you also add a test case to avoid regression in future?
>> We have BPF test cases that fails for this issue. However,
>> not everyone run BPF selftest for netdev changes.
>> It would be better to have a test case for net as well.
>>
>
> The following links are about the errors of bpf selftest. FYI!
>
> -
> https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/7401181881/job/20136944224
> -
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/ce8d3e55-b8bc-409c-ace9-5cf1c4f7c88e@gmail.com/
Thank you for the suggestion and pointers, will do.
cheers,
Victor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists