[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZZZ80QrAwSyBxzxb@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2024 10:39:29 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Antony Antony <antony.antony@...unet.com>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, <devel@...ux-ipsec.org>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 ipsec-next] xfrm: introduce forwarding of ICMP Error
messages
On Fri, Dec 22, 2023 at 01:57:04PM +0100, Antony Antony wrote:
> +
> int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb,
> unsigned short family)
> {
> @@ -3549,9 +3672,17 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk, int dir, struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> for (i = sp->len - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> struct xfrm_state *x = sp->xvec[i];
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> if (!xfrm_selector_match(&x->sel, &fl, family)) {
> - XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINSTATEMISMATCH);
> - return 0;
> + ret = true;
> + if (x->props.flags & XFRM_STATE_ICMP &&
> + xfrm_selector_inner_icmp_match(skb, family, &x->sel, &fl))
> + ret = false;
__xfrm_policy_check returns int, not bool. Please fix these
return values.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists