[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ef96eb69-636c-a91c-e7b7-46b02241ad0d@omp.ru>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 13:46:32 +0300
From: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
To: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] MAINTAINERS: I don't want to review Renesas Ethernet
Switch driver
On 1/5/24 5:42 AM, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
[...]
>>>> I don't know this hardware, I don't have the manuals for it, so I can't
>>>> provide a good review. Let's exclude the Ethernet Switch related files.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>
>>>
>>> Hi Sergey,
>>
>> Hi Simon, long time, no see... :-)
>>
>>> I don't know the back story to this, if there is one.
>>
>> Not much of a history: I got a lot of the rswitch patches in my
>> inbox and I mostly ignored them... but kept deferring this patch due
>> to a high load with fixing Svace's reports at work...
>>
>>> But could I suggest that:
>>>
>>> 1. The patch also updates the title MAINTAINERS section to cover the
>>> remaining two drivers.
>>>
>>> e.g.: RENESAS ETHERNET DRIVERS ->
>>> RENESAS ETHERNET AVB AND SUPERH ETHERNET DRIVERS
>>>
>>> Or alternatively, create separate sections for each driver.
>>
>> Yeah, this 2nd option seems cleaner. Still not sure about Kconfig/
>> Makefile though...
>
> How about adding "COMMON PARTS" section?
>
> - RENESAS ETHERNET AVB AND SUPERH ETHERNET DRIVERS : For ravb and sh_eth
> - RENESAS ETHERNET DRIVERS (COMMON PARTS) : For Kconfig/Makefile in drivers/net/ethernet/renesas
> - RENESAS ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER : For rswitch
No, this seems too much for these poor little couple files. :-)
Listing them in each new MAINTAINERS entry should achieve the same goal
and seems a biut cleaner...
>>> n.b.: This may involve moving sections to maintain alphabetical order
>>> by section title
>>>
>>> 2. Reaching out to Shimoda-san (CCed) or other relevant parties
>>> to see if an appropriate maintainer or maintainers for the
>>> Renesas Ethernet Switch driver can be found.
>
> I'm happy if I'm a maintainer for Renesas Ethernet Switch driver.
Do you want to be a maintainer or just a reviewer (like me)?
> So, if my idea above is acceptable, perhaps the maintainers can be:
>
> - RENESAS ETHERNET AVB AND SUPERH ETHERNET DRIVERS : Sergey
There will be separate entries for those...
> - RENESAS ETHERNET DRIVERS (COMMON PARTS) : Sergey and Shimoda
I'd like to avoid that... :-)
> - RENESAS ETHERNET SWITCH DRIVER : Shimoda
>>> n.b.: It may still be a holiday period in Japan for the rest of the week.
>>
>> It's a holiday period here in Russia as well, till the 8th of Jaunary. :-)
>
> I'm back from today, but next Monday (8th) is a holiday in Japan :)
You're back for 1 day? :-)
> Best regards,
> Yoshihiro Shimoda
>
>>> 3. Rephrase the subject and patch description as splitting out maintenance of
>>> the Renesas Ethernet Switch driver .
The question that remains still unaddressed: should I do the MAINTAINERS
"directory split" with a single patch?
[...]
MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists