netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v2] remove support for iptables action

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2024 06:09:46 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Eyal Birger <eyal.birger@...il.com>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>, victor@...atatu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v2] remove support for iptables action

On Fri, 5 Jan 2024 06:20:10 -0500 Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> > I tested and it looks like the patch doesn't affect em_ipt, as expected.

Thank you!

> > I did however run into a related issue while testing - seems that
> > using the old "ingress" qdisc - that em_ipt iproute2 code still uses -
> > isn't working, i.e:
> >
> > $ tc qdisc add dev ipsec1 ingress
> > Error: Egress block dev insert failed.
> >
> > This seems to originate from recent commit 913b47d3424e
> > ("net/sched: Introduce tc block netdev tracking infra").
> >
> > When I disabled that code in my build I was able to use em_ipt
> > as expected.  
> 
> Resolved in: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20240104125844.1522062-1-jiri@resnulli.us/
> Eyal, if you have cycles please give it a try. Jakub, can we get that applied?

FTR it was applied by Dave soon after you asked.