| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <11225.1704418546@famine>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2024 17:35:46 -0800
From: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
To: Aahil Awatramani <aahila@...gle.com>
cc: David Dillow <dave@...dillows.org>,
Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@...gle.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 net-next v2] bonding: Extending LACP MUX State Machine to include a Collecting State.
Aahil Awatramani <aahila@...gle.com> wrote:
>Introduces two new states, AD_MUX_COLLECTING and AD_MUX_DISTRIBUTING in
>the LACP MUX state machine for separated handling of an initial
>Collecting state before the Collecting and Distributing state. This
>enables a port to be in a state where it can receive incoming packets
>while not still distributing. This is useful for reducing packet loss when
>a port begins distributing before its partner is able to collect.
>Additionally this also brings the 802.3ad bonding driver's implementation
>closer to the LACP specification which already predefined this behaviour,
>that is currently the implementation only supports coupled control.
I think this last sentence is (a) unclear, and (b) should be
first in the paragraph; I'd suggest something like:
Add support for the independent control state machine per IEEE
802.1AX-2008 5.4.15 in addition to the existing implementation of the
coupled control state machine.
The Subject should change in a similar way, e.g., "Add
independent control state machine."
>Added new functions such as bond_set_slave_tx_disabled_flags and
>bond_set_slave_rx_enabled_flags to precisely manage the port's collecting
>and distributing states. Previously, there was no dedicated method to
>disable TX while keeping RX enabled, which this patch addresses.
>
>Note that the regular flow process in the kernel's bonding driver remains
>unaffected by this patch. The extension requires explicit opt-in by the
>user (in order to ensure no disruptions for existing setups) via netlink
>support using the new bonding parameter coupled_control. The default value
>for coupled_control is set to 1 so as to preserve existing behaviour.
How did you test this to insure that the new logic works
correctly against both coupled and independent control implementations?
>Signed-off-by: Aahil Awatramani <aahila@...gle.com>
>---
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c | 159 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 1 +
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_netlink.c | 16 +++
> drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c | 26 ++++-
> include/net/bond_3ad.h | 2 +
> include/net/bond_options.h | 1 +
> include/net/bonding.h | 23 +++++
> include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 1 +
> tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h | 1 +
> 9 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
>index c99ffe6c683a..c2a658f2aaa3 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c
>@@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ static void ad_agg_selection_logic(struct aggregator *aggregator,
> static void ad_clear_agg(struct aggregator *aggregator);
> static void ad_initialize_agg(struct aggregator *aggregator);
> static void ad_initialize_port(struct port *port, int lacp_fast);
>+static void ad_enable_collecting(struct port *port);
>+static void ad_disable_distributing(struct port *port,
>+ bool *update_slave_arr);
> static void ad_enable_collecting_distributing(struct port *port,
> bool *update_slave_arr);
> static void ad_disable_collecting_distributing(struct port *port,
>@@ -171,9 +174,38 @@ static inline int __agg_has_partner(struct aggregator *agg)
> return !is_zero_ether_addr(agg->partner_system.mac_addr_value);
> }
>
>+/**
>+ * __disable_distributing_port - disable the port's slave for distributing.
>+ * Port will still be able to collect.
>+ * @port: the port we're looking at
>+ *
>+ * This will disable only distributing on the port's slave.
>+ */
>+static inline void __disable_distributing_port(struct port *port)
>+{
>+ bond_set_slave_tx_disabled_flags(port->slave, BOND_SLAVE_NOTIFY_LATER);
>+}
>+
>+/**
>+ * __enable_collecting_port - enable the port's slave for collecting,
>+ * if it's up
>+ * @port: the port we're looking at
>+ *
>+ * This will enable only collecting on the port's slave.
>+ */
>+static inline void __enable_collecting_port(struct port *port)
>+{
>+ struct slave *slave = port->slave;
>+
>+ if (slave->link == BOND_LINK_UP && bond_slave_is_up(slave))
>+ bond_set_slave_rx_enabled_flags(slave, BOND_SLAVE_NOTIFY_LATER);
>+}
>+
> /**
> * __disable_port - disable the port's slave
> * @port: the port we're looking at
>+ *
>+ * This will disable both collecting and distributing on the port's slave.
> */
> static inline void __disable_port(struct port *port)
> {
>@@ -183,6 +215,8 @@ static inline void __disable_port(struct port *port)
> /**
> * __enable_port - enable the port's slave, if it's up
> * @port: the port we're looking at
>+ *
>+ * This will enable both collecting and distributing on the port's slave.
> */
> static inline void __enable_port(struct port *port)
> {
>@@ -193,10 +227,24 @@ static inline void __enable_port(struct port *port)
> }
>
> /**
>- * __port_is_enabled - check if the port's slave is in active state
>+ * __port_should_mux_attached - check if port should transition back to attached
>+ * state.
> * @port: the port we're looking at
> */
>-static inline int __port_is_enabled(struct port *port)
>+static inline int __port_should_mux_attached(struct port *port)
This name seems suboptimal, perhaps __port_should_goto_attached_state?
I'll also note that every use of this function then immediately
executes "port->sm_mux_state = AD_MUX_ATTACHED", this could plausibly be
combined into a __port_move_to_attached_state function that returns true
or false, e.g.,
if (__port_should_mux_attached(port)) {
port->sm_mux_state = AD_MUX_ATTACHED;
} else {
/* if port state hasn't changed make
* sure that a collecting distributing
* port in an active aggregator is enabled
*/
if (port->aggregator &&
port->aggregator->is_active &&
would become something like:
if (!__port_move_to_attached_state(port)) {
/* if port state hasn't changed make
* sure that a collecting distributing
* port in an active aggregator is enabled
*/
if (port->aggregator &&
port->aggregator->is_active &&
>+{
>+ return !(port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_SELECTED) ||
>+ (port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_STANDBY) ||
>+ !(port->partner_oper.port_state & LACP_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION) ||
>+ !(port->actor_oper_port_state & LACP_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION);
>+}
>+
>+/**
>+ * __port_is_collecting_distributing - check if the port's slave is in the
>+ * combined collecting/distributing state
>+ * @port: the port we're looking at
>+ */
>+static inline int __port_is_collecting_distributing(struct port *port)
> {
> return bond_is_active_slave(port->slave);
> }
>@@ -942,6 +990,7 @@ static int ad_marker_send(struct port *port, struct bond_marker *marker)
> */
> static void ad_mux_machine(struct port *port, bool *update_slave_arr)
> {
>+ struct bonding *bond = __get_bond_by_port(port);
> mux_states_t last_state;
>
> /* keep current State Machine state to compare later if it was
>@@ -999,9 +1048,13 @@ static void ad_mux_machine(struct port *port, bool *update_slave_arr)
> if ((port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_SELECTED) &&
> (port->partner_oper.port_state & LACP_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION) &&
> !__check_agg_selection_timer(port)) {
>- if (port->aggregator->is_active)
>- port->sm_mux_state =
>- AD_MUX_COLLECTING_DISTRIBUTING;
>+ if (port->aggregator->is_active) {
>+ int state = AD_MUX_COLLECTING_DISTRIBUTING;
>+
>+ if (!bond->params.coupled_control)
>+ state = AD_MUX_COLLECTING;
>+ port->sm_mux_state = state;
>+ }
> } else if (!(port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_SELECTED) ||
> (port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_STANDBY)) {
> /* if UNSELECTED or STANDBY */
>@@ -1019,11 +1072,50 @@ static void ad_mux_machine(struct port *port, bool *update_slave_arr)
> }
> break;
> case AD_MUX_COLLECTING_DISTRIBUTING:
>+ if (__port_should_mux_attached(port)) {
>+ port->sm_mux_state = AD_MUX_ATTACHED;
>+ } else {
>+ /* if port state hasn't changed make
>+ * sure that a collecting distributing
>+ * port in an active aggregator is enabled
>+ */
>+ if (port->aggregator &&
>+ port->aggregator->is_active &&
Is it possible for port->aggregator to be NULL here? I don't
think it's possible for a port to get to this state and not be attached
to an aggregator (it has to be SELECTED by this point).
This test logic could also be moved into a helper function if
the NULL check is necessary.
>+ !__port_is_collecting_distributing(port)) {
>+ __enable_port(port);
>+ *update_slave_arr = true;
>+ }
>+ }
>+ break;
>+ case AD_MUX_COLLECTING:
>+ if (__port_should_mux_attached(port)) {
>+ port->sm_mux_state = AD_MUX_ATTACHED;
>+ } else if ((port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_SELECTED) &&
>+ (port->partner_oper.port_state & LACP_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION) &&
>+ (port->partner_oper.port_state & LACP_STATE_COLLECTING)) {
>+ port->sm_mux_state = AD_MUX_DISTRIBUTING;
>+ } else {
>+ /* If port state hasn't changed, make sure that a collecting
>+ * port is enabled for an active aggregator.
>+ */
>+ if (port->aggregator &&
>+ port->aggregator->is_active) {
Same comment as previous.
>+ struct slave *slave = port->slave;
>+
>+ if (bond_is_slave_rx_disabled(slave) != 0) {
The "!= 0" is superfluous here as bond_is_slave_rx_disabled()
returns a boolean.
>+ ad_enable_collecting(port);
>+ *update_slave_arr = true;
>+ }
>+ }
>+ }
>+ break;
>+ case AD_MUX_DISTRIBUTING:
> if (!(port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_SELECTED) ||
> (port->sm_vars & AD_PORT_STANDBY) ||
>+ !(port->partner_oper.port_state & LACP_STATE_COLLECTING) ||
> !(port->partner_oper.port_state & LACP_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION) ||
> !(port->actor_oper_port_state & LACP_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION)) {
>- port->sm_mux_state = AD_MUX_ATTACHED;
>+ port->sm_mux_state = AD_MUX_COLLECTING;
> } else {
> /* if port state hasn't changed make
> * sure that a collecting distributing
>@@ -1031,7 +1123,7 @@ static void ad_mux_machine(struct port *port, bool *update_slave_arr)
> */
> if (port->aggregator &&
> port->aggregator->is_active &&
>- !__port_is_enabled(port)) {
>+ !__port_is_collecting_distributing(port)) {
> __enable_port(port);
> *update_slave_arr = true;
> }
>@@ -1082,6 +1174,20 @@ static void ad_mux_machine(struct port *port, bool *update_slave_arr)
> update_slave_arr);
> port->ntt = true;
> break;
>+ case AD_MUX_COLLECTING:
>+ port->actor_oper_port_state |= LACP_STATE_COLLECTING;
>+ port->actor_oper_port_state &= ~LACP_STATE_DISTRIBUTING;
>+ port->actor_oper_port_state |= LACP_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION;
>+ ad_enable_collecting(port);
>+ ad_disable_distributing(port, update_slave_arr);
>+ port->ntt = true;
>+ break;
>+ case AD_MUX_DISTRIBUTING:
>+ port->actor_oper_port_state |= LACP_STATE_DISTRIBUTING;
>+ port->actor_oper_port_state |= LACP_STATE_SYNCHRONIZATION;
>+ ad_enable_collecting_distributing(port,
>+ update_slave_arr);
>+ break;
> default:
> break;
> }
>@@ -1906,6 +2012,45 @@ static void ad_initialize_port(struct port *port, int lacp_fast)
> }
> }
>
>+/**
>+ * ad_enable_collecting - enable a port's receive
>+ * @port: the port we're looking at
>+ *
>+ * Enable @port if it's in an active aggregator
>+ */
>+static void ad_enable_collecting(struct port *port)
>+{
>+ if (port->aggregator->is_active) {
>+ struct slave *slave = port->slave;
>+
>+ slave_dbg(slave->bond->dev, slave->dev,
>+ "Enabling collecting on port %d (LAG %d)\n",
>+ port->actor_port_number,
>+ port->aggregator->aggregator_identifier);
>+ __enable_collecting_port(port);
>+ }
>+}
>+
>+/**
>+ * ad_disable_distributing - disable a port's transmit
>+ * @port: the port we're looking at
>+ * @update_slave_arr: Does slave array need update?
>+ */
>+static void ad_disable_distributing(struct port *port, bool *update_slave_arr)
>+{
>+ if (port->aggregator &&
>+ !MAC_ADDRESS_EQUAL(&port->aggregator->partner_system,
>+ &(null_mac_addr))) {
>+ slave_dbg(port->slave->bond->dev, port->slave->dev,
>+ "Disabling distributing on port %d (LAG %d)\n",
>+ port->actor_port_number,
>+ port->aggregator->aggregator_identifier);
>+ __disable_distributing_port(port);
>+ /* Slave array needs an update */
>+ *update_slave_arr = true;
>+ }
>+}
>+
> /**
> * ad_enable_collecting_distributing - enable a port's transmit/receive
> * @port: the port we're looking at
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>index 8e6cc0e133b7..30f4b0ff01c0 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
>@@ -6331,6 +6331,7 @@ static int __init bond_check_params(struct bond_params *params)
> params->ad_actor_sys_prio = ad_actor_sys_prio;
> eth_zero_addr(params->ad_actor_system);
> params->ad_user_port_key = ad_user_port_key;
>+ params->coupled_control = 1;
> if (packets_per_slave > 0) {
> params->reciprocal_packets_per_slave =
> reciprocal_value(packets_per_slave);
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_netlink.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_netlink.c
>index cfa74cf8bb1a..29b4c3d1b9b6 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_netlink.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_netlink.c
>@@ -122,6 +122,7 @@ static const struct nla_policy bond_policy[IFLA_BOND_MAX + 1] = {
> [IFLA_BOND_PEER_NOTIF_DELAY] = NLA_POLICY_FULL_RANGE(NLA_U32, &delay_range),
> [IFLA_BOND_MISSED_MAX] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
> [IFLA_BOND_NS_IP6_TARGET] = { .type = NLA_NESTED },
>+ [IFLA_BOND_COUPLED_CONTROL] = { .type = NLA_U8 },
> };
>
> static const struct nla_policy bond_slave_policy[IFLA_BOND_SLAVE_MAX + 1] = {
>@@ -549,6 +550,16 @@ static int bond_changelink(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct nlattr *tb[],
> return err;
> }
>
>+ if (data[IFLA_BOND_COUPLED_CONTROL]) {
>+ int coupled_control = nla_get_u8(data[IFLA_BOND_COUPLED_CONTROL]);
>+
>+ bond_opt_initval(&newval, coupled_control);
>+ err = __bond_opt_set(bond, BOND_OPT_COUPLED_CONTROL, &newval,
>+ data[IFLA_BOND_COUPLED_CONTROL], extack);
>+ if (err)
>+ return err;
>+ }
>+
> return 0;
> }
>
>@@ -615,6 +626,7 @@ static size_t bond_get_size(const struct net_device *bond_dev)
> /* IFLA_BOND_NS_IP6_TARGET */
> nla_total_size(sizeof(struct nlattr)) +
> nla_total_size(sizeof(struct in6_addr)) * BOND_MAX_NS_TARGETS +
>+ nla_total_size(sizeof(u8)) + /* IFLA_BOND_COUPLED_CONTROL */
> 0;
> }
>
>@@ -774,6 +786,10 @@ static int bond_fill_info(struct sk_buff *skb,
> bond->params.missed_max))
> goto nla_put_failure;
>
>+ if (nla_put_u8(skb, IFLA_BOND_COUPLED_CONTROL,
>+ bond->params.coupled_control))
>+ goto nla_put_failure;
>+
> if (BOND_MODE(bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD) {
> struct ad_info info;
>
>diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
>index f3f27f0bd2a6..af5d3c57700b 100644
>--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
>+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_options.c
>@@ -84,7 +84,8 @@ static int bond_option_ad_user_port_key_set(struct bonding *bond,
> const struct bond_opt_value *newval);
> static int bond_option_missed_max_set(struct bonding *bond,
> const struct bond_opt_value *newval);
>-
>+static int bond_option_coupled_control_set(struct bonding *bond,
>+ const struct bond_opt_value *newval);
>
> static const struct bond_opt_value bond_mode_tbl[] = {
> { "balance-rr", BOND_MODE_ROUNDROBIN, BOND_VALFLAG_DEFAULT},
>@@ -232,6 +233,12 @@ static const struct bond_opt_value bond_missed_max_tbl[] = {
> { NULL, -1, 0},
> };
>
>+static const struct bond_opt_value bond_coupled_control_tbl[] = {
>+ { "on", 1, BOND_VALFLAG_DEFAULT},
>+ { "off", 0, 0},
>+ { NULL, -1, 0},
>+};
>+
> static const struct bond_option bond_opts[BOND_OPT_LAST] = {
> [BOND_OPT_MODE] = {
> .id = BOND_OPT_MODE,
>@@ -496,6 +503,14 @@ static const struct bond_option bond_opts[BOND_OPT_LAST] = {
> .desc = "Delay between each peer notification on failover event, in milliseconds",
> .values = bond_peer_notif_delay_tbl,
> .set = bond_option_peer_notif_delay_set
>+ },
>+ [BOND_OPT_COUPLED_CONTROL] = {
>+ .id = BOND_OPT_COUPLED_CONTROL,
>+ .name = "coupled_control",
>+ .desc = "Opt into using coupled control MUX for LACP states",
>+ .unsuppmodes = BOND_MODE_ALL_EX(BIT(BOND_MODE_8023AD)),
>+ .values = bond_coupled_control_tbl,
>+ .set = bond_option_coupled_control_set,
> }
> };
>
>@@ -1692,3 +1707,12 @@ static int bond_option_ad_user_port_key_set(struct bonding *bond,
> bond->params.ad_user_port_key = newval->value;
> return 0;
> }
>+
>+static int bond_option_coupled_control_set(struct bonding *bond,
>+ const struct bond_opt_value *newval)
>+{
>+ netdev_info(bond->dev, "Setting coupled_control to %s (%llu)\n",
>+ newval->string, newval->value);
>+ bond->params.coupled_control = newval->value;
>+ return 0;
>+}
I believe this should permit changes to coupled_control only if
the bond is down, or up with no interfaces attached to it. The two
state machines are not interchangable.
-J
>diff --git a/include/net/bond_3ad.h b/include/net/bond_3ad.h
>index c5e57c6bd873..9ce5ac2bfbad 100644
>--- a/include/net/bond_3ad.h
>+++ b/include/net/bond_3ad.h
>@@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ typedef enum {
> AD_MUX_DETACHED, /* mux machine */
> AD_MUX_WAITING, /* mux machine */
> AD_MUX_ATTACHED, /* mux machine */
>+ AD_MUX_COLLECTING, /* mux machine */
>+ AD_MUX_DISTRIBUTING, /* mux machine */
> AD_MUX_COLLECTING_DISTRIBUTING /* mux machine */
> } mux_states_t;
>
>diff --git a/include/net/bond_options.h b/include/net/bond_options.h
>index 69292ecc0325..473a0147769e 100644
>--- a/include/net/bond_options.h
>+++ b/include/net/bond_options.h
>@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ enum {
> BOND_OPT_MISSED_MAX,
> BOND_OPT_NS_TARGETS,
> BOND_OPT_PRIO,
>+ BOND_OPT_COUPLED_CONTROL,
> BOND_OPT_LAST
> };
>
>diff --git a/include/net/bonding.h b/include/net/bonding.h
>index 5b8b1b644a2d..b61fb1aa3a56 100644
>--- a/include/net/bonding.h
>+++ b/include/net/bonding.h
>@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ struct bond_params {
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> struct in6_addr ns_targets[BOND_MAX_NS_TARGETS];
> #endif
>+ int coupled_control;
>
> /* 2 bytes of padding : see ether_addr_equal_64bits() */
> u8 ad_actor_system[ETH_ALEN + 2];
>@@ -167,6 +168,7 @@ struct slave {
> u8 backup:1, /* indicates backup slave. Value corresponds with
> BOND_STATE_ACTIVE and BOND_STATE_BACKUP */
> inactive:1, /* indicates inactive slave */
>+ rx_disabled:1, /* indicates whether slave's Rx is disabled */
> should_notify:1, /* indicates whether the state changed */
> should_notify_link:1; /* indicates whether the link changed */
> u8 duplex;
>@@ -568,6 +570,14 @@ static inline void bond_set_slave_inactive_flags(struct slave *slave,
> bond_set_slave_state(slave, BOND_STATE_BACKUP, notify);
> if (!slave->bond->params.all_slaves_active)
> slave->inactive = 1;
>+ if (BOND_MODE(slave->bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD)
>+ slave->rx_disabled = 1;
>+}
>+
>+static inline void bond_set_slave_tx_disabled_flags(struct slave *slave,
>+ bool notify)
>+{
>+ bond_set_slave_state(slave, BOND_STATE_BACKUP, notify);
> }
>
> static inline void bond_set_slave_active_flags(struct slave *slave,
>@@ -575,6 +585,14 @@ static inline void bond_set_slave_active_flags(struct slave *slave,
> {
> bond_set_slave_state(slave, BOND_STATE_ACTIVE, notify);
> slave->inactive = 0;
>+ if (BOND_MODE(slave->bond) == BOND_MODE_8023AD)
>+ slave->rx_disabled = 0;
>+}
>+
>+static inline void bond_set_slave_rx_enabled_flags(struct slave *slave,
>+ bool notify)
>+{
>+ slave->rx_disabled = 0;
> }
>
> static inline bool bond_is_slave_inactive(struct slave *slave)
>@@ -582,6 +600,11 @@ static inline bool bond_is_slave_inactive(struct slave *slave)
> return slave->inactive;
> }
>
>+static inline bool bond_is_slave_rx_disabled(struct slave *slave)
>+{
>+ return slave->rx_disabled;
>+}
>+
> static inline void bond_propose_link_state(struct slave *slave, int state)
> {
> slave->link_new_state = state;
>diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
>index 29ff80da2775..7a54fcff2eec 100644
>--- a/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
>+++ b/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
>@@ -976,6 +976,7 @@ enum {
> IFLA_BOND_AD_LACP_ACTIVE,
> IFLA_BOND_MISSED_MAX,
> IFLA_BOND_NS_IP6_TARGET,
>+ IFLA_BOND_COUPLED_CONTROL,
> __IFLA_BOND_MAX,
> };
>
>diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
>index a0aa05a28cf2..f0d71b2a3f1e 100644
>--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
>+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_link.h
>@@ -974,6 +974,7 @@ enum {
> IFLA_BOND_AD_LACP_ACTIVE,
> IFLA_BOND_MISSED_MAX,
> IFLA_BOND_NS_IP6_TARGET,
>+ IFLA_BOND_COUPLED_CONTROL,
> __IFLA_BOND_MAX,
> };
>
>--
>2.43.0.472.g3155946c3a-goog
>
>
---
-Jay Vosburgh, jay.vosburgh@...onical.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists