[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZZp8UPkH-TJIUngl@codewreck.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 19:26:24 +0900
From: Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>
To: Vitaly Chikunov <vt@...linux.org>
Cc: Christian Schoenebeck <linux_oss@...debyte.com>,
Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@...ras.ru>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
v9fs@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@...ras.ru>,
lvc-project@...uxtesting.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] net: 9p: avoid freeing uninit memory in p9pdu_vreadf
Vitaly Chikunov wrote on Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 10:56:23AM +0300:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 08:21:30AM +0900, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> > Christian Schoenebeck wrote on Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 01:54:02PM +0100:
> > > I just checked whether this could create a leak, but it looks clean, so LGTM:
> >
> > Right, either version look good to me.
>
> Also, there was unnoticed bug in v2[1] - `int i` is moved to outer block
> and `i` counld be used uninitialized inside of `if (errcode) {`.
Thanks for pointing it out; I'm not sure if it's the same thing
Christian noticed but I believe what I had applied with his suggestion
of initializing i worked either way... But this is moot since I updated
to v4 afterwards:
this v4 has been merged in 6.7-rc7 as follow:
https://git.kernel.org/linus/ff49bf1867578f23a5ffdd38f927f6e1e16796c4
(the message-id also points to the v4 correctly, e.g.
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20231206200913.16135-1-pchelkin@ispras.ru )
Thanks,
--
Dominique Martinet | Asmadeus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists