netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mt7530: support OF-based registration of switch MDIO bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240107195241.GB132648@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2024 19:52:41 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Cc: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
	Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>,
	DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
	Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
	David Bauer <mail@...id-bauer.net>, mithat.guner@...ont.com,
	erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com,
	Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca <luizluca@...il.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: dsa: mt7530: support OF-based registration
 of switch MDIO bus

On Sat, Jan 06, 2024 at 03:21:42PM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> From: David Bauer <mail@...id-bauer.net>
> 
> Currently the MDIO bus of the switches the MT7530 DSA subdriver controls
> can only be registered as non-OF-based. Bring support for registering the
> bus OF-based.
> 
> The subdrivers that control switches [with MDIO bus] probed on OF must
> follow this logic to support all cases properly:
> 
> No switch MDIO bus defined: Populate ds->user_mii_bus, register the MDIO
> bus, set the interrupts for PHYs if "interrupt-controller" is defined at
> the switch node. This case should only be covered for the switches which
> their dt-bindings documentation didn't document the MDIO bus from the
> start. This is to keep supporting the device trees that do not describe the
> MDIO bus on the device tree but the MDIO bus is being used nonetheless.
> 
> Switch MDIO bus defined: Don't populate ds->user_mii_bus, register the MDIO
> bus, set the interrupts for PHYs if ["interrupt-controller" is defined at
> the switch node and "interrupts" is defined at the PHY nodes under the
> switch MDIO bus node].
> 
> Switch MDIO bus defined but explicitly disabled: If the device tree says
> status = "disabled" for the MDIO bus, we shouldn't need an MDIO bus at all.
> Instead, just exit as early as possible and do not call any MDIO API.
> 
> The use of ds->user_mii_bus is inappropriate when the MDIO bus of the
> switch is described on the device tree [1], which is why we don't populate
> ds->user_mii_bus in that case.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20231213120656.x46fyad6ls7sqyzv@skbuf/ [1]
> Suggested-by: David Bauer <mail@...id-bauer.net>
> Signed-off-by: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> index 391c4dbdff42..39d7e7ad7154 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> @@ -2153,17 +2153,25 @@ mt7530_free_irq(struct mt7530_priv *priv)
>  static int
>  mt7530_setup_mdio(struct mt7530_priv *priv)
>  {
> +	struct device_node *mnp, *np = priv->dev->of_node;
>  	struct dsa_switch *ds = priv->ds;
>  	struct device *dev = priv->dev;
>  	struct mii_bus *bus;
>  	static int idx;
> -	int ret;
> +	int ret = 0;
> +
> +	mnp = of_get_child_by_name(np, "mdio");
> +
> +	if (mnp && !of_device_is_available(mnp))
> +		goto out;

nit: I think it would easier on the eyes to simply

		return 0;

>  
>  	bus = devm_mdiobus_alloc(dev);
>  	if (!bus)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	ds->user_mii_bus = bus;
> +	if (!mnp)
> +		ds->user_mii_bus = bus;
> +
>  	bus->priv = priv;
>  	bus->name = KBUILD_MODNAME "-mii";
>  	snprintf(bus->id, MII_BUS_ID_SIZE, KBUILD_MODNAME "-%d", idx++);
> @@ -2174,16 +2182,18 @@ mt7530_setup_mdio(struct mt7530_priv *priv)
>  	bus->parent = dev;
>  	bus->phy_mask = ~ds->phys_mii_mask;
>  
> -	if (priv->irq)
> +	if (priv->irq && !mnp)
>  		mt7530_setup_mdio_irq(priv);
>  
> -	ret = devm_mdiobus_register(dev, bus);
> +	ret = devm_of_mdiobus_register(dev, bus, mnp);
> +	of_node_put(mnp);
>  	if (ret) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "failed to register MDIO bus: %d\n", ret);
>  		if (priv->irq)
>  			mt7530_free_mdio_irq(priv);
>  	}
>  
> +out:
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.40.1
>