netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 4/5] net: phy: marvell-88q2xxx: fix typos

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240108143119.GB36576@debian>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 15:31:19 +0100
From: Dimitri Fedrau <dima.fedrau@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Stefan Eichenberger <eichest@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 4/5] net: phy: marvell-88q2xxx: fix typos

Am Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 03:02:18PM +0100 schrieb Andrew Lunn:
> On Mon, Jan 08, 2024 at 10:36:59AM +0100, Dimitri Fedrau wrote:
> > Rename mv88q2xxxx_get_sqi to mv88q2xxx_get_sqi and
> > mv88q2xxxx_get_sqi_max to mv88q2xxx_get_sqi_max.
> > Fix linebreaks and use everywhere hexadecimal numbers written with
> > lowercase letters instead of mixing it up.
> 
> You could split is up into three patches. Its probably not worth it
> now, but its something to remember for the future.
> 
> Ideally you want lots of small patches which are obviously correct.  A
> patch just containing a rename mv88q2xxxx_get_XXX to
> mv88q2xxx_get_sqi_XXX etc, should be obviously correct, and just takes
> a few seconds to review.
> 
> A patch adding a few line breaks should again take a few seconds to
> review.
> 
> Upper case to lower case is easy to review.
> 
> When it is all mixed together, in a bigger patch it takes a bit more
> effort to review, a bit more effort is needed to look for typ0s etc.
> Its can be faster and easier to review 10 very simple patches than 3
> big patches...
>
It makes totally sense to me. Haven't thought about it. Thanks for
your explanation. I will keep it in mind for future patches.

>     Andrew

Best regards,
Dimitri