[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2ba1b5d7-cf89-4942-a65e-674347389cbe@tuxon.dev>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:23:41 +0200
From: claudiu beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
To: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@....ru>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
richardcochran@...il.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com, wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, geert+renesas@...der.be,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 08/19] net: ravb: Move the IRQs get and
request in the probe function
On 05.01.2024 22:57, Sergey Shtylyov wrote:
> On 1/5/24 11:23 AM, Claudiu wrote:
>
>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
>>
>> The runtime PM implementation will disable clocks at the end of
>> ravb_probe(). As some IP variants switch to reset mode as a result of
>> setting module standby through clock disable APIs, to implement runtime PM
>> the resource parsing and requesting are moved in the probe function and IP
>> settings are moved in the open function. This is done because at the end of
>> the probe some IP variants will switch anyway to reset mode and the
>> registers content is lost. Also keeping only register specific operations
>> in the ravb_open()/ravb_close() functions will make them faster.
>>
>> Commit moves IRQ requests to ravb_probe() to have all the IRQs ready when
>> the interface is open. As now IRQs gets and requests are in a single place
>> there is no need to keep intermediary data (like ravb_rx_irqs[] and
>> ravb_tx_irqs[] arrays or IRQs in struct ravb_private).
>>
>> This is a preparatory change to add runtime PM support for all IP variants.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>
> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
>> index e0f8276cffed..e3506888cca6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h
>> @@ -1089,10 +1089,6 @@ struct ravb_private {
>> int msg_enable;
>> int speed;
>> int emac_irq;
>> - int erra_irq;
>> - int mgmta_irq;
>> - int rx_irqs[NUM_RX_QUEUE];
>> - int tx_irqs[NUM_TX_QUEUE];
>
> Good! :-)
>
> [...]
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
>> index 4673cc2faec0..ac6488ffa29a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c
> [...]
>> @@ -1727,85 +1717,21 @@ static const struct ethtool_ops ravb_ethtool_ops = {
>> .set_wol = ravb_set_wol,
>> };
>>
>> -static inline int ravb_hook_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler,
>> - struct net_device *ndev, struct device *dev,
>> - const char *ch)
>> -{
>> - char *name;
>> - int error;
>> -
>> - name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s:%s", ndev->name, ch);
>
> Ugh! Should've fixed this outrage... :-/
>
> [...]
>> @@ -2616,6 +2509,90 @@ static void ravb_parse_delay_mode(struct device_node *np, struct net_device *nde
>> }
>> }
>>
>> +static int ravb_setup_irq(struct ravb_private *priv, const char *irq_name,
>> + const char *ch, int *irq, irq_handler_t handler)
>> +{
>> + struct platform_device *pdev = priv->pdev;
>> + struct net_device *ndev = priv->ndev;
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + const char *dev_name;
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + int error;
>> +
>> + if (irq_name) {
>> + dev_name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "%s:%s", ndev->name, ch);
>> + if (!dev_name)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + *irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, irq_name);
>> + flags = 0;
>> + } else {
>> + dev_name = ndev->name;
>> + *irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> + flags = IRQF_SHARED;
>> + }
>> + if (*irq < 0)
>> + return *irq;
>> +
>> + error = devm_request_irq(dev, *irq, handler, flags, dev_name, ndev);
>> + if (error)
>> + netdev_err(ndev, "cannot request IRQ %s\n", irq_name);
>
> What will be printed when irq_name is NULL? Shouldn't this be dev_name
> instead?
Indeed, should have been dev_name.
Maybe better would be to have irq_name and IRQ0 instead as the users of
this don't request IRQ from buf (where buf is sprintf(buf, "%s:%s",
ndev->name, ch)) but they request irq_name or IRQ0.
>
>> +
>> + return error;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int ravb_setup_irqs(struct ravb_private *priv)
>> +{
>> + const struct ravb_hw_info *info = priv->info;
>> + struct net_device *ndev = priv->ndev;
>> + const char *irq_name, *emac_irq_name;
>> + int error, irq;
>> +
>> + if (!info->multi_irqs)
>> + return ravb_setup_irq(priv, NULL, NULL, &ndev->irq, ravb_interrupt);
>> +
>> + if (info->err_mgmt_irqs) {
>> + irq_name = "dia";
>> + emac_irq_name = "line3";
>> + } else {
>> + irq_name = "ch22";
>> + emac_irq_name = "ch24";
>> + }
>> +
>> + error = ravb_setup_irq(priv, irq_name, "ch22:multi", &ndev->irq, ravb_multi_interrupt);
>> + if (error)
>> + return error;
>> +
>> + error = ravb_setup_irq(priv, emac_irq_name, "ch24:emac", &priv->emac_irq,
>> + ravb_emac_interrupt);
>> + if (error)
>> + return error;
>> +
>> + if (info->err_mgmt_irqs) {
>> + error = ravb_setup_irq(priv, "err_a", "err_a", &irq, ravb_multi_interrupt);
>
> Hm, why pass 2 identical names?
1st name is what is used by platform_get_irq_by_name(), 2nd name is used to
fill the name of the IRQ after it has been requested. Perviously the same
naming schema was used.
>
>> + if (error)
>> + return error;
>> +
>> + error = ravb_setup_irq(priv, "mgmt_a", "mgmt_a", &irq, ravb_multi_interrupt);
>
> Here as well?
>
>> + if (error)
>> + return error;
>> + }
>> +
>> + error = ravb_setup_irq(priv, "ch0", "ch0:rx_be", &irq, ravb_be_interrupt);
>
> Hm, won't this result in "ch0:ch0:rx_be" as IRQ name?
No, first "ch0" is to call:
platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "ch0");
"ch0:rx_be" is passed to
devm_kasprintf(..., "%s:%s", ndev->name, "ch0:rx_be");
and fill the name of IRQ after devm_request_irq(). Previously it was the same.
>
>> + if (error)
>> + return error;
>> +
>> + error = ravb_setup_irq(priv, "ch1", "ch1:rx_nc", &irq, ravb_nc_interrupt);
>
> Same question...
>
>> + if (error)
>> + return error;
>> +
>> + error = ravb_setup_irq(priv, "ch18", "ch18:tx_be", &irq, ravb_be_interrupt);
>
> And here as well...
>
>> + if (error)
>> + return error;
>> +
>> + return ravb_setup_irq(priv, "ch19", "ch19:tx_nc", &irq, ravb_nc_interrupt);
>
> Here too...
>
> [...]
>
> MBR, Sergey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists