netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/6] netfs, cachefiles: More additional patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAB9dFdt0haftd1LPo=_GmtcZvFR84w81eaARfUKW2KMSM5gxqg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 13:11:39 -0400
From: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, 
	Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com>, Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>, 
	Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, 
	Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.com>, Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@...rosoft.com>, Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>, 
	Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...nel.org>, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, linux-cachefs@...hat.com, 
	linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org, v9fs@...ts.linux.dev, 
	linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-mm@...ck.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] netfs, cachefiles: More additional patches

On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 7:20 AM David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Christian, Jeff, Gao,
>
> Here are some additional patches for my netfs-lib tree:
>
>  (1) Mark netfs_unbuffered_write_iter_locked() static as it's only used in
>      the file in which it is defined.
>
>  (2) Display a counter for DIO writes in /proc/fs/netfs/stats.
>
>  (3) Fix the interaction between write-streaming (dirty data in
>      non-uptodate pages) and the culling of a cache file trying to write
>      that to the cache.
>
>  (4) Fix the loop that unmarks folios after writing to the cache.  The
>      xarray iterator only advances the index by 1, so if we unmarked a
>      multipage folio and that got split before we advance to the next
>      folio, we see a repeat of a fragment of the folio.
>
>  (5) Fix a mixup with signed/unsigned offsets when prepping for writing to
>      the cache that leads to missing error detection.
>
>  (6) Fix a wrong ifdef hiding a wait.
>
> David
>
> The netfslib postings:
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231013160423.2218093-1-dhowells@redhat.com/ # v1
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231117211544.1740466-1-dhowells@redhat.com/ # v2
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231207212206.1379128-1-dhowells@redhat.com/ # v3
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213152350.431591-1-dhowells@redhat.com/ # v4
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231221132400.1601991-1-dhowells@redhat.com/ # v5
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240103145935.384404-1-dhowells@redhat.com/ # added patches
>
> David Howells (6):
>   netfs: Mark netfs_unbuffered_write_iter_locked() static
>   netfs: Count DIO writes
>   netfs: Fix interaction between write-streaming and cachefiles culling
>   netfs: Fix the loop that unmarks folios after writing to the cache
>   cachefiles: Fix signed/unsigned mixup
>   netfs: Fix wrong #ifdef hiding wait
>
>  fs/cachefiles/io.c            | 18 +++++++++---------
>  fs/netfs/buffered_write.c     | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>  fs/netfs/direct_write.c       |  5 +++--
>  fs/netfs/fscache_stats.c      |  9 ++++++---
>  fs/netfs/internal.h           |  8 ++------
>  fs/netfs/io.c                 |  2 +-
>  fs/netfs/stats.c              | 13 +++++++++----
>  include/linux/fscache-cache.h |  3 +++
>  include/linux/netfs.h         |  1 +
>  9 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linux-cachefs@...hat.com" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linux-cachefs+unsubscribe@...hat.com.

This passes our kafs tests where a few of the issues fixed here had been seen.
I made the framework use 9p and no related issues were seen there either.

Tested-by: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>

Marc