lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240110140121.GA28014@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 15:01:21 +0100
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] netfilter: nfnetlink_log: use proper helper for
 fetching physinif

Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
> On 10/01/2024 21:33, Florian Westphal wrote:
> > Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@...tuozzo.com> wrote:
> > I think you can drop this patch and make the last patch pass
> > nf_bridge_info->physinif directly.
> 
> The whole Idea of this patch was to replace nf_bridge_get_physindev with
> nf_bridge_get_physinif before the patch which propagates net, so that we
> don't need to propagate net first and then in later patch remove it when
> replacing with nf_bridge_get_physinif.
> 
> But I spoiled it by forgetting to remove net propagation to
> __build_packet_message...
> 
> Is it ok if I leave this patch as is, but instead remove:

Yes, thats fine.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ