[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <458ecf3d755ffd7df33913b87cd6ad6f8e1c07ef.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 22:27:13 +0200
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>, Maxim Mikityanskiy
<maxtram95@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann
<daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Shung-Hsi Yu
<shung-hsi.yu@...e.com>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Martin
KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song
<yonghong.song@...ux.dev>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav
Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa
<jolsa@...nel.org>, Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan
<shuah@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski
<kuba@...nel.org>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 15/15] selftests/bpf: states pruning checks
for scalar vs STACK_{MISC,ZERO}
On Tue, 2024-01-09 at 16:27 -0800, Andrii Nakryiko wrote:
[...]
> same, please double check this STACK_xxx assumptions, as now we spill
> registers instead of STACK_ZERO in a lot of cases
Right, the test is outdated after your recent fixes for STACK_ZERO.
Thank you for catching this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists