netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/5] netdevsim: allow two netdevsim ports to be connected

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2024 17:53:48 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
 Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 2/5] netdevsim: allow two netdevsim ports to
 be connected

On Tue, 9 Jan 2024 08:57:59 -0800 David Wei wrote:
> >> +	ret = sscanf(buf, "%u %u", &id, &port);
> >> +	if (ret != 2) {
> >> +		pr_err("Format is peer netdevsim \"id port\" (uint uint)\n");  
> > 
> > netif_err() or dev_err() ? Granted the rest of the file seems to use
> > pr_err(), but I'm not sure why...  
> 
> I can change it to use one of these two in this patchset, then I can
> chnage the others separately in another patch. How does that sound?

Separate patch and separate series. Let's not load more unrelated
patches into this series :)