netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 01/24] locking/local_lock: Introduce guard definition for local

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240111161915.QlfL1DLS@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 17:19:15 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 01/24] locking/local_lock: Introduce guard
 definition for local_lock.

On 2023-12-18 09:16:49 [+0100], Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > --- a/include/linux/local_lock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/local_lock.h
> > @@ -51,4 +51,15 @@
> >  #define local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)			\
> >  	__local_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)
> >  
> > +DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock, local_lock_t,
> > +		    local_lock(_T->lock),
> > +		    local_unlock(_T->lock))
> > +DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(local_lock_irq, local_lock_t,
> > +		    local_lock_irq(_T->lock),
> > +		    local_unlock_irq(_T->lock))
> 
> DEFINE_GUARD should fit for the 2 above, right?

Yes, that will work. Let me update it.

> Cheers,
> 
> Paolo

Sebastian