netdev - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Update LLVM Phabricator and Bugzilla links

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 12:34:17 -0800
From: Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev, 
	patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, 
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	bridge@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, 
	ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, mykolal@...com, 
	bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Update LLVM Phabricator and Bugzilla links

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 4:46 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2024 at 03:16:28PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > This series updates all instances of LLVM Phabricator and Bugzilla links
> > to point to GitHub commits directly and LLVM's Bugzilla to GitHub issue
> > shortlinks respectively.
> >
> > I split up the Phabricator patch into BPF selftests and the rest of the
> > kernel in case the BPF folks want to take it separately from the rest of
> > the series, there are obviously no dependency issues in that case. The
> > Bugzilla change was mechanical enough and should have no conflicts.
> >
> > I am aiming this at Andrew and CC'ing other lists, in case maintainers
> > want to chime in, but I think this is pretty uncontroversial (famous
> > last words...).
> >
> > ---
> > Nathan Chancellor (3):
> >       selftests/bpf: Update LLVM Phabricator links
> >       arch and include: Update LLVM Phabricator links
> >       treewide: Update LLVM Bugzilla links
> >
> >  arch/arm64/Kconfig                                 |  4 +--
> >  arch/powerpc/Makefile                              |  4 +--
> >  arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_hv_nested.c                |  2 +-
> >  arch/riscv/Kconfig                                 |  2 +-
> >  arch/riscv/include/asm/ftrace.h                    |  2 +-
> >  arch/s390/include/asm/ftrace.h                     |  2 +-
> >  arch/x86/power/Makefile                            |  2 +-
> >  crypto/blake2b_generic.c                           |  2 +-
> >  drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/Makefile              |  2 +-
> >  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_4_2.c           |  2 +-
> >  drivers/media/test-drivers/vicodec/codec-fwht.c    |  2 +-
> >  drivers/regulator/Kconfig                          |  2 +-
> >  include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h                  |  2 +-
> >  include/linux/compiler-clang.h                     |  2 +-
> >  lib/Kconfig.kasan                                  |  2 +-
> >  lib/raid6/Makefile                                 |  2 +-
> >  lib/stackinit_kunit.c                              |  2 +-
> >  mm/slab_common.c                                   |  2 +-
> >  net/bridge/br_multicast.c                          |  2 +-
> >  security/Kconfig                                   |  2 +-
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/README.rst             | 32 +++++++++++-----------
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdpwall.c   |  2 +-
> >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/test_core_reloc_type_id.c  |  2 +-
> >  23 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
> > ---
> > base-commit: 0dd3ee31125508cd67f7e7172247f05b7fd1753a
> > change-id: 20240109-update-llvm-links-d03f9d649e1e
> >
> > Best regards,
> > --
> > Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
> >
>
> Excellent! Thanks for doing this. I spot checked a handful I was
> familiar with and everything looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
>
> --
> Kees Cook
>

These reviews.llvm.org links would definitely be kept like
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/ or cfe-dev links
(discussions have been migrated to Discourse).
However, I agree that the github repo link looks more official. I have
clicked a few links and they look good.

Since I maintain reviews.llvm.org and created the static archive [1],

Acked-by: Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>

[1]: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/llvm-phabricator-turndown/76137

-- 
宋方睿