netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] x86/kvm, ptp/kvm: Add clocksource ID, set system_counterval_t.cs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <97c53faf-2eeb-43e7-a146-b53da8ea14c2@opensynergy.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 12:32:09 +0100
From: Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 "D, Lakshmi Sowjanya" <lakshmi.sowjanya.d@...el.com>,
 Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, jstultz@...gle.com,
 giometti@...eenne.com, corbet@....net, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@...el.com>,
 "Hall, Christopher S" <christopher.s.hall@...el.com>,
 Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini
 <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
 x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
 Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
 Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
 Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/7] x86/kvm, ptp/kvm: Add clocksource ID, set
 system_counterval_t.cs_id

On 18.12.23 11:23, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 11:06:08PM +0100, Peter Hilber wrote:
>> Add a clocksource ID for the x86 kvmclock.
>>
>> Also, for ptp_kvm, set the recently added struct system_counterval_t member
>> cs_id to the clocksource ID (x86 kvmclock or Arm Generic Timer). In the
>> future, this will keep get_device_system_crosststamp() working, when it
>> will compare the clocksource id in struct system_counterval_t, rather than
>> the clocksource.
>>
>> For now, to avoid touching too many subsystems at once, extract the
>> clocksource ID from the clocksource. The clocksource dereference will be
>> removed in the following.
> 
> ...
> 
>>  #include <linux/clocksource.h>
>> +#include <linux/clocksource_ids.h>
> 
> It's the second file that includes both.
> 
> I'm just wondering if it makes sense to always (?) include the latter into
> the former.
> 

Actually, clocksource.h already includes clocksource_ids.h, always since
the latter was created. So I'll just omit the unnecessary clocksource_ids.h
includes in other files.

Thanks for the comment,

Peter