netdev - [PATCH net-next 01/15] net/smc: improve SMC-D device dump for virtual ISM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240111120036.109903-2-guwen@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2024 20:00:22 +0800
From: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: wintera@...ux.ibm.com,
	wenjia@...ux.ibm.com,
	hca@...ux.ibm.com,
	gor@...ux.ibm.com,
	agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	jaka@...ux.ibm.com
Cc: borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
	svens@...ux.ibm.com,
	alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com,
	tonylu@...ux.alibaba.com,
	guwen@...ux.alibaba.com,
	linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 01/15] net/smc: improve SMC-D device dump for virtual ISM

The introduction of virtual ISM requires improvement of SMC-D device
dump. Software implemented non-PCI device (loopback-ism) should be
handled correctly and the CHID reserved for virtual ISM should be got
from smcd_ops interface instead of PCI information.

Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
 net/smc/smc_ism.c | 13 ++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/smc/smc_ism.c b/net/smc/smc_ism.c
index ac88de2a06a0..66bcfddd3fcf 100644
--- a/net/smc/smc_ism.c
+++ b/net/smc/smc_ism.c
@@ -252,12 +252,11 @@ static int smc_nl_handle_smcd_dev(struct smcd_dev *smcd,
 	char smc_pnet[SMC_MAX_PNETID_LEN + 1];
 	struct smc_pci_dev smc_pci_dev;
 	struct nlattr *port_attrs;
+	struct device *device;
 	struct nlattr *attrs;
-	struct ism_dev *ism;
 	int use_cnt = 0;
 	void *nlh;
 
-	ism = smcd->priv;
 	nlh = genlmsg_put(skb, NETLINK_CB(cb->skb).portid, cb->nlh->nlmsg_seq,
 			  &smc_gen_nl_family, NLM_F_MULTI,
 			  SMC_NETLINK_GET_DEV_SMCD);
@@ -272,7 +271,15 @@ static int smc_nl_handle_smcd_dev(struct smcd_dev *smcd,
 	if (nla_put_u8(skb, SMC_NLA_DEV_IS_CRIT, use_cnt > 0))
 		goto errattr;
 	memset(&smc_pci_dev, 0, sizeof(smc_pci_dev));
-	smc_set_pci_values(to_pci_dev(ism->dev.parent), &smc_pci_dev);
+	device = smcd->ops->get_dev(smcd);
+	if (device->parent)
+		smc_set_pci_values(to_pci_dev(device->parent), &smc_pci_dev);
+	if (smc_ism_is_virtual(smcd)) {
+		smc_pci_dev.pci_pchid = smc_ism_get_chid(smcd);
+		if (!device->parent)
+			snprintf(smc_pci_dev.pci_id, sizeof(smc_pci_dev.pci_id),
+				 "%s", dev_name(device));
+	}
 	if (nla_put_u32(skb, SMC_NLA_DEV_PCI_FID, smc_pci_dev.pci_fid))
 		goto errattr;
 	if (nla_put_u16(skb, SMC_NLA_DEV_PCI_CHID, smc_pci_dev.pci_pchid))
-- 
2.32.0.3.g01195cf9f