netdev - Re: [PATCH] wifi: mac80211: tx: Add __must

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87sf31hhfp.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 08:32:26 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Brent Pappas <bpappas@...pasbrent.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,  "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>,  Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,  Jakub
 Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,  Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
  linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,  netdev@...r.kernel.org,
  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: mac80211: tx: Add __must_hold() annotation

Brent Pappas <bpappas@...pasbrent.com> writes:

> Annotates ieee80211_set_beacon_cntdwn() with a __must_hold() annotation to
> make it clear that ieee80211_set_beacon_cntdwn() is only intended to be
> called when the caller has a lock on the argument "link."
>
> Signed-off-by: Brent Pappas <bpappas@...pasbrent.com>
> ---
>
> Currently, ieee80211_set_beacon_cntdwn() calls rcu_dereference(), but
> without calling rcu_read_lock() beforehand and rcu_read_unlock()
> afterward.  At first I thought this was a bug, since (if I understand the
> RCU API correctly) rcu_dereference() should only be called in RCU
> read-side critical sections. However, upon closer inspection of the code,
> I realized that ieee80211_set_beacon_cntdwn() is only ever called inside
> critical sections. Therefore it seems appropriate to me to annotate
> ieee80211_set_beacon_cntdwn() with a __must_hold() annotation to make this
> apparent precondition explicit.
>
> This is my first time submitting an RCU-related patch so please tell me if
> I am misunderstanding the RCU API.
>
>  net/mac80211/tx.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/mac80211/tx.c b/net/mac80211/tx.c
> index 314998fdb1a5..7245f2e641ba 100644
> --- a/net/mac80211/tx.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/tx.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>   * Transmit and frame generation functions.
>   */
>  
> +#include "linux/compiler_types.h"
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/skbuff.h>
> @@ -4974,6 +4975,7 @@ static int ieee80211_beacon_add_tim(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
>  static void ieee80211_set_beacon_cntdwn(struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata,
>  					struct beacon_data *beacon,
>  					struct ieee80211_link_data *link)
> +	__must_hold(link)

Oh, never seen __must_hold() before and looks very useful. So does this
work with RCU, mutexes and spinlocks?

In case others are interested, here's the documentation I was able to find:

https://docs.kernel.org/dev-tools/sparse.html#using-sparse-for-lock-checking

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches