[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240117160030.140264-13-pablo@netfilter.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 17:00:28 +0100
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To: netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com,
fw@...len.de
Subject: [PATCH net 12/14] netfilter: nf_tables: reject NFT_SET_CONCAT with not field length description
It is still possible to set on the NFT_SET_CONCAT flag by specifying a
set size and no field description, report EINVAL in such case.
Fixes: 1b6345d4160e ("netfilter: nf_tables: check NFT_SET_CONCAT flag if field_count is specified")
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
---
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 88a6a858383b..4b55533ce5ca 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -5070,8 +5070,12 @@ static int nf_tables_newset(struct sk_buff *skb, const struct nfnl_info *info,
if (err < 0)
return err;
- if (desc.field_count > 1 && !(flags & NFT_SET_CONCAT))
+ if (desc.field_count > 1) {
+ if (!(flags & NFT_SET_CONCAT))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ } else if (flags & NFT_SET_CONCAT) {
return -EINVAL;
+ }
} else if (flags & NFT_SET_CONCAT) {
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists