[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1705470800.285488-2-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 13:53:20 +0800
From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/17] virtio-net: support AF_XDP zero copy (3/3)
On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 15:46:00 -0500, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 07:07:05AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Jan 2024 13:37:30 +0100 Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > > For future submission it would be better if you split this series in
> > > smaller chunks: the maximum size allowed is 15 patches.
> >
> > Which does not mean you can split it up and post them all at the same
> > time, FWIW.
>
>
> Really it's just 17 I don't think it matters. Some patches could be
> squashed easily but I think that would be artificial.
Yes. About this patch set I think a lot. This is the core code for the function.
I think we should not split it. And some commits are simply.
Thanks.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists