[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <99bad052-b28d-4ef3-8141-19620ca49451@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 16:47:34 -0800
From: Kui-Feng Lee <sinquersw@...il.com>
To: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, thinker.li@...il.com
Cc: kuifeng@...a.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
ast@...nel.org, song@...nel.org, kernel-team@...a.com, andrii@...nel.org,
drosen@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v16 03/14] bpf, net: introduce
bpf_struct_ops_desc.
On 1/18/24 13:30, Martin KaFai Lau wrote:
> On 1/17/24 5:49 PM, thinker.li@...il.com wrote:
>> @@ -1750,11 +1755,6 @@ static inline int
>> bpf_struct_ops_map_sys_lookup_elem(struct bpf_map *map,
>> {
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>> -static inline int bpf_struct_ops_link_create(union bpf_attr *attr)
>> -{
>> - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> -}
>> -
>
> This patch is about adding bpf_struct_ops_desc. Why the
> bpf_struct_ops_link_create() is removed here?
> An unrelated (and unnecessary?) changes?
Sorry! It is a mistake causing by rebasing.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists