netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] net: ti: icssg-prueth: Add support for ICSSG switch firmware

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240119204154.GD105385@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 20:41:54 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
	Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, srk@...com, r-gunasekaran@...com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] net: ti: icssg-prueth: Add support for ICSSG
 switch firmware

On Thu, Jan 18, 2024 at 12:40:05PM +0530, MD Danish Anwar wrote:

...

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icssg_switchdev.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icssg_switchdev.c
> index 48d8ed4fa7a8..90d0d98e0ef9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icssg_switchdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/icssg/icssg_switchdev.c
> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
>  
>  #include "icssg_prueth.h"
>  #include "icssg_switchdev.h"
> -#include "icss_mii_rt.h"
> +#include "icssg_mii_rt.h"
>  
>  struct prueth_switchdev_event_work {
>  	struct work_struct work;

Hi,

I think this hunk should be squashed into the previous patch.