[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3404710d9ab4692aa33501514122604@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 22:45:45 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Eric Dumazet' <edumazet@...gle.com>, "David S . Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "eric.dumazet@...il.com"
<eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 net] udp: fix busy polling
...
> +static inline bool sk_is_inet(const struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + int family = READ_ONCE(sk->sk_family);
> +
> + return family == AF_INET || family == AF_INET6;
> +}
> +
> static inline bool sk_is_tcp(const struct sock *sk)
> {
> - return sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM && sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP;
> + return sk_is_inet(sk) &&
> + sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM &&
> + sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_TCP;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool sk_is_udp(const struct sock *sk)
> +{
> + return sk_is_inet(sk) &&
> + sk->sk_type == SOCK_DGRAM &&
> + sk->sk_protocol == IPPROTO_UDP;
> }
Do you need to check sk_type as well as sk_protocol?
I'd have thought it was enough to check sk_protocol
and then sk_family ?
Certainly testing sk_protocol first will generate 'false'
quickest.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists